Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in St Clair County

This page covers 7 elementary schools in St Clair County. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Alabama
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Springville Elementary School
Grades PK–05978 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
18.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
2
rank
Steele Elementary School
Grades PK–06147 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
16.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
71%
High economic need
3
rank
Moody Elementary School
Grades PK–03835 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
18.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
54%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Margaret Elementary
Grades PK–05727 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
19.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
58%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Ashville Elementary School
Grades PK–04506 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
40
/100
Student:Teacher
18.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
72%
High economic need
6
rank
Odenville Elementary School
Grades PK–02436 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
38
/100
Student:Teacher
20.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
67%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Odenville Intermediate School
Grades 03–05373 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
35
/100
Student:Teacher
21.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,167
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
73%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
20
Total Schools
46
#1 Score
41
Avg Score
StateAlabama →
District profileSt Clair County →
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare St Clair County with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.