Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Scottsdale Unified District (4240)

This page covers 6 middle schools in Scottsdale Unified District (4240). Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

6
Schools Ranked
Arizona
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 6 of 6
1
rank
Desert Canyon Middle School
Grades 06–08490 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
58
/100
Student:Teacher
16.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
2
rank
Mohave Middle School
Grades 06–08799 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (6.7:1)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
6.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
28/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
3
rank
Mountainside Middle School
Grades 06–08550 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
17.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
11%
Low economic need
4
rank
Cocopah Middle School
Grades 06–08886 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
52
/100
Student:Teacher
20.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
9%
Low economic need
5
rank
Ingleside Middle School
Grades 06–08777 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
18.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Tonalea Middle School
Grades 06–08442 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
40
/100
Student:Teacher
14.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
28/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,713
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
77%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
6
Middle Schools
30
Total Schools
58
#1 Score
52
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
Other School Levels
Compare Scottsdale Unified District (4240) with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.