Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Enterprise Elementary

This page covers 7 elementary schools in Enterprise Elementary. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
California
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
PACE Academy
Grades KG–0830 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.4:1) · above-average investment ($17,410/student)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
7.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
90%
High economic need
2
rank
Boulder Creek Elementary
Grades KG–08874 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
43
/100
Student:Teacher
22.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
53%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Mistletoe Elementary
Grades KG–08644 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
41
/100
Student:Teacher
22.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
69%
High economic need
4
rank
Alta Mesa Elementary
Grades KG–08343 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
40
/100
Student:Teacher
22.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
77%
High economic need
5
rank
Rother Elementary
Grades KG–05277 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
40
/100
Student:Teacher
21.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
86%
High economic need
6
rank
Lassen View Elementary
Grades KG–05415 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
37
/100
Student:Teacher
24.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
77%
High economic need
7
rank
Shasta Meadows Elementary
Grades KG–05336 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,410/student)
37
/100
Student:Teacher
24.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,410
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
79%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
9
Total Schools
63
#1 Score
43
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
PACE Academy
Score: 63/100
Other School Levels
Compare Enterprise Elementary with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.