Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Catoosa County

This page covers 10 elementary schools in Catoosa County. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

10
Schools Ranked
Georgia
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 10
1
rank
Battlefield Elementary School
Grades 03–05429 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
57
/100
Student:Teacher
13.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
49%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Battlefield Primary
Grades PK–02492 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
55
/100
Student:Teacher
14.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
51%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Cloud Springs Elementary School
Grades KG–05279 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.6:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
8.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
74%
High economic need
4
rank
Boynton Elementary School
Grades PK–05602 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
51
/100
Student:Teacher
14.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
32%
Low economic need
5
rank
Woodstation Elementary School
Grades PK–05400 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
42%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Ringgold Elementary School
Grades 03–05441 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.4:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
12.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
42%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Tiger Creek Elementary School
Grades PK–05477 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.2:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
12.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
57%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
Ringgold Primary School
Grades PK–02552 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
47%
Near nat'l 52.2%
9
rank
Graysville Elementary School
Grades KG–05591 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
14.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
10
rank
West Side Elementary School
Grades PK–05508 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.5:1)
48
/100
Student:Teacher
12.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,325
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
73%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
10
Elementary Schools
16
Total Schools
57
#1 Score
52
Avg Score
District profileCatoosa County
Top Ranked Elementary School
Compare Catoosa County with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.