Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Linn-Mar Comm School District

This page covers 7 elementary schools in Linn-Mar Comm School District. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Iowa
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Westfield Elementary School
Grades KG–04506 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
58
/100
Student:Teacher
15.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
20%
Low economic need
2
rank
Novak Elementary School
Grades KG–04371 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.6:1)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
11.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
27%
Low economic need
3
rank
Wilkins Elementary School
Grades PK–04388 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.7:1)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
12.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
41%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Indian Creek Elementary School
Grades KG–04411 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
56
/100
Student:Teacher
14.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
14%
Low economic need
5
rank
Linn Grove Elementary School
Grades PK–04412 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.3:1)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
12.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
39%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Echo Hill Elementary
Grades PK–04544 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
56
/100
Student:Teacher
15.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
7%
Low economic need
7
rank
Bowman Woods Elementary School
Grades PK–04439 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
13.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,857
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
23%
Low economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
12
Total Schools
58
#1 Score
56
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Compare Linn-Mar Comm School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.