Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Terrebonne Parish

This page covers 7 middle schools in Terrebonne Parish. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Louisiana
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Oaklawn Middle School
Grades 05–08587 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
15.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
66%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Lacache Middle School
Grades 05–08304 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
48
/100
Student:Teacher
19.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
59%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Houma Junior High School
Grades 07–08729 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
47
/100
Student:Teacher
20.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
56%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Montegut Middle School
Grades 05–08500 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
47
/100
Student:Teacher
20.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
53%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Grand Caillou Middle School
Grades 05–08318 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
45
/100
Student:Teacher
17.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
77%
High economic need
6
rank
Caldwell Middle School
Grades 04–06298 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
43
/100
Student:Teacher
19.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
72%
High economic need
7
rank
Evergreen Junior High School
Grades 07–08699 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($16,995/student)
43
/100
Student:Teacher
21.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,995
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
63%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Middle Schools
31
Total Schools
49
#1 Score
46
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
Compare Terrebonne Parish with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.