Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in RAYTOWN C-2

This page covers 10 elementary schools in RAYTOWN C-2. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

10
Schools Ranked
Missouri
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 10
1
rank
LAUREL HILLS ELEM.
Grades KG–05314 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.7:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
10.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
71%
High economic need
2
rank
LITTLE BLUE ELEMENTARY
Grades KG–05373 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.9:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
11.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
65%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
BLUE RIDGE ELEM.
Grades KG–05329 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.4:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
12.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
69%
High economic need
4
rank
FLEETRIDGE ELEM.
Grades KG–05315 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.0:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
13.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
65%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
ROBINSON ELEM.
Grades KG–05345 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.1:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
13.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
60%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
SOUTHWOOD ELEM.
Grades KG–05343 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.1:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
12.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
60%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
NORFLEET ELEM.
Grades KG–05311 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
14.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
67%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
WESTRIDGE ELEM.
Grades KG–05321 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1)
48
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
74%
High economic need
9
rank
SPRING VALLEY ELEM.
Grades KG–05380 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
47
/100
Student:Teacher
13.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
74%
High economic need
10
rank
EASTWOOD HILLS ELEM.
Grades KG–05329 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.0:1)
46
/100
Student:Teacher
11.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
31/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,391
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
82%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
10
Elementary Schools
20
Total Schools
53
#1 Score
50
Avg Score
District profileRAYTOWN C-2
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
LAUREL HILLS ELEM.
Score: 53/100
Compare RAYTOWN C-2 with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.