Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Woodbridge Township School District

This page covers 5 middle schools in Woodbridge Township School District. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

5
Schools Ranked
New Jersey
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 5 of 5
1
rank
Colonia Middle School
Grades 06–08560 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.9:1) · above-average investment ($26,897/student)
73
/100
Student:Teacher
8.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
57/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$26,897
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
21%
Low economic need
2
rank
Iselin Middle School
Grades 06–08849 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.1:1) · above-average investment ($26,897/student)
67
/100
Student:Teacher
12.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
53/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$26,897
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
3
rank
Woodbridge Middle School
Grades 06–08517 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.0:1) · above-average investment ($26,897/student)
66
/100
Student:Teacher
10.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$26,897
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
46%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Avenel Middle School
Grades 06–08587 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.9:1) · above-average investment ($26,897/student)
66
/100
Student:Teacher
7.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
46/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$26,897
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
48%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Fords Middle School
Grades 06–08593 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.4:1) · above-average investment ($26,897/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
9.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$26,897
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
51%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
5
Middle Schools
25
Total Schools
73
#1 Score
67
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
Compare Woodbridge Township School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.