Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #17

This page covers 9 middle schools in NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #17. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

9
Schools Ranked
New York
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 9 of 9
1
rank
IS 340
Grades 06–08150 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.6:1)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
8.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Free Lunch
84%
High economic need
2
rank
ELIJAH STROUD MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08121 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.5:1)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
7.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Free Lunch
94%
High economic need
3
rank
NEW HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08248 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.0:1)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
11.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
4
rank
EBBETS FIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08123 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (6.8:1)
54
/100
Student:Teacher
6.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
94%
High economic need
5
rank
MS 61 DR GLADSTONE H ATWELL
Grades 06–08361 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.3:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
9.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
85%
High economic need
6
rank
MS 246 WALT WHITMAN
Grades 06–08308 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.9:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
9.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Free Lunch
86%
High economic need
7
rank
RONALD EDMONDS LEARNING CENTER II
Grades 06–08135 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.9:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
7.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
32/100
Below nat'l median
Free Lunch
87%
High economic need
8
rank
PARKSIDE PREPARATORY ACADEMY
Grades 06–08311 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.0:1)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
10.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
9
rank
SCHOOL OF INTEGRATED LEARNING (THE)
Grades 06–08199 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.8:1)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
9.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
36/100
Below nat'l median
Free Lunch
90%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
9
Middle Schools
49
Total Schools
64
#1 Score
54
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
IS 340
Score: 64/100
Compare NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #17 with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.