Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

This page covers 6 middle schools in SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

6
Schools Ranked
New York
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 6 of 6
1
rank
EXPEDITIONARY LEARNING MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08170 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.8:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
62
/100
Student:Teacher
7.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
76%
High economic need
2
rank
CLARY MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08275 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.5:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
59
/100
Student:Teacher
9.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
89%
High economic need
3
rank
GRANT MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08608 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.7:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
10.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
93%
High economic need
4
rank
LINCOLN MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08508 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.7:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
10.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
90%
High economic need
5
rank
SYRACUSE STEM AT BLODGETT
Grades 06–08369 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.8:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
8.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
96%
High economic need
6
rank
BRIGHTON ACADEMY
Grades 06–08342 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.7:1) · above-average investment ($29,229/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
8.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$29,229
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
97%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
6
Middle Schools
31
Total Schools
62
#1 Score
58
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
Compare SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.