Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Dickson County

This page covers 8 elementary schools in Dickson County. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Tennessee
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
The Discovery School
Grades KG–05205 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.3:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
9.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
Charlotte Elementary
Grades PK–05616 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
13.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
3
rank
Dickson Elementary
Grades PK–05242 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.5:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
10.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
4
rank
Oakmont Elementary
Grades PK–05474 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.3:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
11.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
5
rank
White Bluff Elementary
Grades PK–05464 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.5:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
11.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
6
rank
Centennial Elementary
Grades PK–05682 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
13.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
7
rank
Vanleer Elementary
Grades PK–05267 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1)
47
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
8
rank
Stuart Burns Elementary
Grades PK–05740 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
15.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,402
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Elementary Schools
17
Total Schools
53
#1 Score
50
Avg Score
StateTennessee →
District profileDickson County →
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
Other School Levels
Compare Dickson County with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.