Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in KELLER ISD

This page covers 10 middle schools in KELLER ISD. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

10
Schools Ranked
Texas
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 10
1
rank
KELLER MIDDLE
Grades 07–08921 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
65
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
10%
Low economic need
2
rank
INDIAN SPRINGS MIDDLE
Grades 05–08901 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
64
/100
Student:Teacher
13.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
3
rank
BEAR CREEK INT
Grades 05–06898 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
62
/100
Student:Teacher
16.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
10%
Low economic need
4
rank
TIMBERVIEW MIDDLE
Grades 05–081,069 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
62
/100
Student:Teacher
13.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
25%
Low economic need
5
rank
TRINITY SPRINGS MIDDLE
Grades 07–08915 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.2:1)
61
/100
Student:Teacher
13.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
32%
Low economic need
6
rank
FOSSIL HILL MIDDLE
Grades 06–08838 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.9:1)
59
/100
Student:Teacher
9.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
61%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
HILLWOOD MIDDLE
Grades 07–081,228 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
58
/100
Student:Teacher
13.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
TRINITY MEADOWS INT
Grades 05–06924 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
57
/100
Student:Teacher
15.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
36%
Low economic need
9
rank
VISTA RIDGE MIDDLE
Grades 06–08822 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.5:1)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
12.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
51%
Near nat'l 52.2%
10
rank
PARKWOOD HILL INT
Grades 05–061,174 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
56
/100
Student:Teacher
15.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,074
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
36%
Low economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
10
Middle Schools
41
Total Schools
65
#1 Score
60
Avg Score
District profileKELLER ISD
Top Ranked Middle School
1
KELLER MIDDLE
Score: 65/100
Compare KELLER ISD with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.