Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Montgomery County Public Schools

This page covers 11 elementary schools in Montgomery County Public Schools. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

11
Schools Ranked
Virginia
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 11
1
rank
CHRISTIANSBURG PRIMARY
Grades PK–02405 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.9:1)
59
/100
Student:Teacher
11.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
49%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Christiansburg Elementary
Grades 03–05407 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
57
/100
Student:Teacher
14.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
41%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Belview Elementary
Grades PK–05293 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.7:1)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
12.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
52%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Falling Branch Elementary
Grades PK–05576 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.2:1)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
13.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
52%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Auburn Elementary
Grades PK–05558 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
14.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
50%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Kipps Elementary
Grades KG–05369 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.2:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
13.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
20%
Low economic need
7
rank
Gilbert Linkous Elementary
Grades PK–05329 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.7:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
12.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
24%
Low economic need
8
rank
Harding Avenue Elementary
Grades KG–05296 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
18%
Low economic need
9
rank
Margaret Beeks Elementary
Grades PK–05343 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.9:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
11.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
36%
Low economic need
10
rank
Prices Fork Elementary
Grades PK–05440 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,583
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
58%
Near nat'l 52.2%
1 more elementary schools in Montgomery County Public Schools not shown here.
View all schools in Montgomery County Public Schools
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
11
Elementary Schools
19
Total Schools
59
#1 Score
54
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Compare Montgomery County Public Schools with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.