Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in Everett School District

This page covers 6 of the 7 high schools in Everett School District had enough federal data to rank. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

6
Schools Ranked
Washington
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 6 of 6
1
rank
Everett High School
Grades 09–121,606 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (98%) · above-average investment ($19,204/student)
68
/100
Graduation Rate
98%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
19.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
2
rank
Henry M. Jackson High School
Grades 09–122,155 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (100%) · above-average investment ($19,204/student)
67
/100
Graduation Rate
100%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
23.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
3
rank
Cascade High School
Grades 09–121,793 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (95%) · above-average investment ($19,204/student)
66
/100
Graduation Rate
95%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
21.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
4
rank
Sequoia High School
Grades 09–12161 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (7.3:1) · above-average investment ($19,204/student)
66
/100
Graduation Rate
72%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
7.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
5
rank
NW Learning Center
Grades 09–121 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($19,204/student)
52
/100
Opportunity
53/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
6
rank
Everett Reengagement Academy
Grades 09–12126 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($19,204/student)
40
/100
Graduation Rate
32%
Below nat'l avg
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$19,204
Above nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
6
High Schools
33
Total Schools
68
#1 Score
60
Avg Score
Top Ranked High School
1
Everett High School
Score: 68/10098% graduation
Compare Everett School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.