Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Neenah Joint School District

This page covers 10 elementary schools in Neenah Joint School District, including 1 charter school. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

10
Schools Ranked
Wisconsin
State
1
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 10
1
rank
Clayton Elementary
Grades KG–05251 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
14.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
13%
Low economic need
2
rank
Roosevelt Elementary
Grades KG–05113 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.8:1) · above-average investment ($22,158/student)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
10.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
51%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Coolidge Elementary
Grades KG–05349 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
39%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Spring Road Elementary
Grades KG–05359 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
14.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
5
rank
Tullar Elementary
Grades KG–05392 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
15.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
18%
Low economic need
6
rank
Taft Elementary
Grades KG–05229 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.4:1) · above-average investment ($22,158/student)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
11.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
61%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Hoover Elementary
Grades PK–05236 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1) · above-average investment ($22,158/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
65%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
Wilson Elementary
Grades PK–05267 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1) · above-average investment ($22,158/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
57%
Near nat'l 52.2%
9
rank
Lakeview Elementary
Grades KG–05405 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
17.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
10
rank
ACE Alliance Charter Elementary
Grades KG–05121 studentsCharter
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,158/student)
54
/100
Student:Teacher
18.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,158
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
9%
Low economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
10
Elementary Schools
14
Total Schools
58
#1 Score
56
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
Clayton Elementary
Score: 58/100
Compare Neenah Joint School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.