Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Dearborn City School District

This page covers 8 middle schools in Dearborn City School District. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Michigan
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
Smith Middle School
Grades 06–08465 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1) · above-average investment ($17,667/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
62%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Salina Intermediate 4 8
Grades 04–08475 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.1:1) · above-average investment ($17,667/student)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
12.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
88%
High economic need
3
rank
Bryant Middle School
Grades 06–08796 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
17.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
58%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Dearborn STEM Middle School
Grades 06–08164 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
19.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
41%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Stout Middle School
Grades 06–08790 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
48
/100
Student:Teacher
15.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
6
rank
Woodworth Middle School
Grades 06–08773 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
44
/100
Student:Teacher
17.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
88%
High economic need
7
rank
Lowrey Middle School
Grades 06–08500 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
44
/100
Student:Teacher
16.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
89%
High economic need
8
rank
Unis Middle School
Grades 06–08579 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($17,667/student)
44
/100
Student:Teacher
17.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$17,667
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
87%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Middle Schools
36
Total Schools
57
#1 Score
49
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
Smith Middle School
Score: 57/100
Compare Dearborn City School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.