Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Howard County Public Schools

This page covers 20 middle schools in Howard County Public Schools. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

20
Schools Ranked
Maryland
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 20
1
rank
Glenwood Middle
Grades 06–08493 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.2:1) · above-average investment ($20,893/student)
71
/100
Student:Teacher
13.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
11%
Low economic need
2
rank
Lime Kiln Middle
Grades 06–08643 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
70
/100
Student:Teacher
14.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
9%
Low economic need
3
rank
Mount View Middle
Grades 06–08894 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
16.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
59/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
8%
Low economic need
4
rank
Clarksville Middle
Grades 06–08649 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
15.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
53/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
7%
Low economic need
5
rank
Ellicott Mills Middle
Grades 06–08670 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1) · above-average investment ($20,893/student)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
17%
Low economic need
6
rank
Elkridge Landing Middle
Grades 06–08680 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1) · above-average investment ($20,893/student)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
56/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
28%
Low economic need
7
rank
Hammond Middle School
Grades 06–08570 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
14.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
55/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
17%
Low economic need
8
rank
Patapsco Middle
Grades 06–08661 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
18%
Low economic need
9
rank
Murray Hill Middle
Grades 06–08591 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.8:1) · above-average investment ($20,893/student)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
11.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
55/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
10
rank
Folly Quarter Middle
Grades 06–08683 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($20,893/student)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
15.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$20,893
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
5%
Low economic need
10 more middle schools in Howard County Public Schools not shown here.
View all schools in Howard County Public Schools
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
20
Middle Schools
77
Total Schools
71
#1 Score
62
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
Glenwood Middle
Score: 71/100
Compare Howard County Public Schools with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.